Difference between revisions of "Marriage equality"
Ross Burgess (Talk | contribs) (→Civil partnerships) |
Ross Burgess (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
| − | </table>]]'''Marriage equality''' refers to the extension to same-sex couples of the ability to get married in the same way as opposite-sex couples. Full same-sex marriage has now been legally recognised in a number of | + | </table>]]'''Marriage equality''' refers to the extension to same-sex couples of the ability to get married in the same way as opposite-sex couples. Full same-sex marriage has now been legally recognised in a number of countries around the world (starting with the Netherlands in 2001) and in some states of the USA. In the UK, demand for same-sex marriage was initially met by the introduction of [[civil partnership]]s, which provide almost all of the rights and obligations of marriage. However some differences remain, which has led tothe campaign to extend marriage as such to same-sex couples. |
==Partnership registrations== | ==Partnership registrations== | ||
Revision as of 11:17, 23 May 2012
Rings indicate areas where local judges have granted marriage or imposed the death penalty in a country where that is not otherwise the law. 1May include recent laws or court decisions which have created legal recognition of same-sex relationships, but which have not yet come into force. 2Or unregistered cohabitation. |
Contents
Partnership registrations
In response for the growing call for some form of recognition of same-sex relationships, the then Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone introduced the London Partnership Register in 2001. This enabled same-sex couples to have a degree of recognition by an official body of their relationship, but had no legal force. It was open to opposite-sex as well as same-sex couples. Similar registers were set up in other places in the UK. The success of the London Partnership Register, and the lack of any public outcry against it, is thought to have paved the way for the introduction of civil partnerships.
Civil partnerships
Civil partnerships were introduced by the Labour Government under the Civil Partnership Act 2004. The first civil partnerships were formed in December 2005. Civil partnerships were essentially designed to parallel civil (as opposed to religious) marriage, hence the prohibition on holding a civil partnership ceremony on religious premises (this ban has since been removed) or on including any religious element in the ceremony.
One difference from civil marriage as that sex is not mentioned in the law. A marriage can be annulled if it's not consummated (ie if the couple don't have sex together) and one of the ground for divorce is adultery (ie if one of the couple has sex with someone else): there's no equivalent for either of these in the case of civil partnerships. As a result the Church of England, which officially disapproves its clergy having homosexual relationships, has not banned its priests from entering into civil partnerships, on the grounds that they can do so and still remain sexually celibate.
