X v the United Kingdom: Difference between revisions
Ross Burgess (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Ross Burgess (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''X v the United Kingdom''' was a case heard by the [[European Commission | '''X v the United Kingdom''' was a case heard by the [[European Commission of Human Rights]] in 1977. It was the first time that a complaint relating to homosexuality was ruled admissible, but even so it did not get as far as the [[European Court of Human Rights|Court]]. | ||
X had been convicted and sent to prison for sex with an 18-year old men when he was 26, and complained that this constituted discrimination. The complaint was eventually rejected because of the suggestion that there was an element of coercion in the particular relatinship.<ref>[[Paul Johnson]], ''Homosexuality and the European Court of Human Rights'', pages 37–39.</ref> | X had been convicted and sent to prison for sex with an 18-year old men when he was 26, and complained that this constituted discrimination. The complaint was eventually rejected because of the suggestion that there was an element of coercion in the particular relatinship.<ref>[[Paul Johnson]], ''Homosexuality and the European Court of Human Rights'', pages 37–39.</ref> | ||
Revision as of 18:40, 30 November 2012
X v the United Kingdom was a case heard by the European Commission of Human Rights in 1977. It was the first time that a complaint relating to homosexuality was ruled admissible, but even so it did not get as far as the Court.
X had been convicted and sent to prison for sex with an 18-year old men when he was 26, and complained that this constituted discrimination. The complaint was eventually rejected because of the suggestion that there was an element of coercion in the particular relatinship.[1]
References
<references>
- ↑ Paul Johnson, Homosexuality and the European Court of Human Rights, pages 37–39.